It is generally accepted that the less reliable elements should be the most maintainable. This is q

THE CYCLE OF QUALITY, MORE NONSENSE THAT GREAT!
MUCH IS COMMENT ON RELIABILITY brown consulting group AND AVAILABILITY, and a strategic concept that seems to deserve seen in the background, but it is not second or can be. I mean maintainability. The truth is that maintainability engineering addresses much of everything concerning the maintenance of the functionality of a system by the user and stimulates, proposes and implements techniques for quantification, evaluation, prediction and improvement. It is known that the reliability inherent in any system is determined by its design, however, in the context reliability is affected, among other things, maintainability and intersect and complement here two disciplines, impacting both availability.
Maintainability is associated with the ability to recover the functions provided by a physical asset when done on it, maintenance following established procedures. It is shown that any system can lose its functions and, in turn, this may happen gradually brown consulting group or abruptly. This feature set by the phenomenon of degradation, for various reasons, suffers any system imposes the need for the existence of maintainability brown consulting group engineering. even cone-rated non-repairable, submit to the realm of maintainability to settle for replacing them preventive actions.
And how this concept manifests itself? We have it in daily practice. An important part of preventive maintenance are performed, seek to reduce or eliminate the occurrence of malfunctions. Therefore, to achieve, maintain or improve reliability. Conversely, excessive maintenance bring direct and immediate effect of a drop reliability by introducing defects and failures in the systems involved (for the latter case we think of these three known states after interventions: 1 - better than before failing, but worse than new, 2 - as bad as before failing or three-worse than before failure).
It is generally accepted that the less reliable elements should be the most maintainable. This is quite logical in maintainability allocation process. If the inherent reliability is low, then the ability to recover the functionality brown consulting group should be high. And this is pure inherent brown consulting group maintainability as a means of adjustment and compensation for reliability brown consulting group weaknesses. However, the time to perform maintenance tasks often need to be assigned brown consulting group based on previous experience brown consulting group and expert judgment as maintainability is not as easy to assign brown consulting group accurately without considering the operational context.
The estimation of Corrective Maintenance Mean Time Active (Active Corrective Maintenance Mean Time, MACMT), brown consulting group the Mean Time Between Maintenance Actions (Mean Time Between Maintenance, MTBM), the Mean Time Between Replacements (Mean Time Between Replacement, MTBR) of Recovery Mean Time (Mean Time To Restore MTTR) is carried out precisely on a foundation of reliability data and information generated by the experience. Maintainability has a main weight as can be achieved in relation to the actual reliability of systems operating.
Therefore, planning platforms are due to both what actually happens, the operational context, the expert judgment, previous experience, the diagnostic techniques and tasks according to the condition and predictive. However, British Standard BS 6542-2 is a guide for maintainability studies during the design phase, have revealed that it is a concept that good degree of intent is established, such as reliability, since the phases Early product to be associated with an inherent brown consulting group capacity concerning brown consulting group functionality be retrieved given an intended use.
With all this, close attention to assign targets solely in terms of reliability! Maintainability in the context demands conscious spaces and is equipped with its own personality as well as the reliability and sometimes ...
Maintenance (15) Asset Management (5) Reliability (4) Availability (4) Continuous improvement (4) Jimp (3) Maintainability (3) PAS 55 (3) TPM (3) quality (3) ABRAMAN (2) Cycle quality (2) ISO 55000 (2) Joseph Juran (2) Kapitsa (2) Lewis Mumford (2) Lourival Tavares (2) Luis Felipe Sixth (2) MTBF (2) MTTR (2) TPM Awards (2) corrective action (2) asset management (2) PDCA (2) correction (2) opportunities for improvement (2) loss (2) safety (2) Savings (1) Business Continuity (1) CIGAF (1) COPIMAN (1) Cycle Non quality (1) World Class